Trumputin

ALL’ARMI son FASCISTI

 

faireyicahope
Cara Consuelo Trevisan e cari amici,
ieri io non sapevo ancora che una narrativa dominante del fascista prossimamente alla Casa Bianca Steve Bannon (come spiega sul New Yorker Ryan Lizza in modo chiaro e convincente, https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/steve-bannon-will-lead-trumps-white-house) è la congiura dei banchieri ebrei globalisti, nottetempo alleati ad Obama:

Bannon injected Trump’s speeches with language about global élites and bankers. Clinton “meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty,” Trump said in an October speech that was so disturbing in its coded anti-Semitism that the Anti-Defamation League spoke out against it. Trump’s final TV ad of the campaign combined excerpts from the speech, decrying “those who control the levers of power in Washington,” with images of George Soros, Janet Yellen, and Lloyd Blankfein, all of whom are Jewish. “This needs to stop,” Jonathan Greenblatt, the head of the A.D.L., said in a statement.

Qui siamo all’Hitlerismo docg da discorso alla birreria di Munich. Al confronto, l’antisemitismo della Jihad  sarebbe all’acqua di rose, se non andasse oltre il discorso, alle armi.

Anch’ió chiamo alle armi le persone conservatrici o liberali, populiste, socialiste o altro di buona volontà. FERMIAMO TRUMPUTIN, ricacciamolo nel suo grattacielo – fogna. Facciamogli guerra con ogni mezzo lecito, anche un impeachment al mese.

 
A questo punto io cambio completamente il mio sistema di alleanze politiche “dal Centro”, non per mio ghiribizzo (ero ben contento di seguire i cari FHC e Vargas Llosa verso una buona Destra) perché è la realtà a cambiare a 180° con le elezioni a sorpresa e – molto peggio, ad un N.mo populista moderat0 avremmo riso in faccia  – una Casa Bianca neofascista, mica solo un suó consulente, con possibile deriva NAZISTA.
Come lib-soc, i miei primi alleati da oggi sono sempre Obama, la Merkel e Juppé come prima; e ora, quando passo in Italia, anche quello scemo di guerra di Renzi (il Cav ha pure licenziato il bravo Parisi…).
La brutta nana Brunetta
ha chiuso il duello a Sky comtro Giachetti con:
“Basta essere. politicamente corretti, basta disquisizioni sul merito, votiamo tutti NO per cacciare Renzi.”  E quanti coglioni, anche cari amici van dietro al pifferaio nano.
Io voglio che Renzi resti. Non voglio né il Trumputinian9 Salvini, nè una marionetta   Orwelliana di Casaleggio Jr o Di Maio – Grillo – Raggi. Altri nani da giardino.

Non rifaccio Stalin che divide la sinistra per mandare su Hitler: quello era proprio l’obiettivo primario di Stalin, FOTTERE la Repubblica di WEIMAR, mica un suo errore!

 

Advertisements

on Poincaré and a 2006 Field medal refused!

A phalse metropolitan legend says Mr Nobel didn’t introduce the Nobel in Maths, since the best mathematician at the epoch was his wife’s lover. Then comes Poincare’s conjecture proof, another legend

Annals of Mathematics

Manifold Destiny

A legendary problem and the battle over who solved it.

by Sylvia Nasar and David Gruber August 28, 2006

On the evening of June 20th, several hundred physicists, including a Nobel laureate, assembled in an auditorium at the Friendship Hotel in Beijing for a lecture by the Chinese mathematician Shing-Tung Yau. In the late nineteen-seventies, when Yau was in his twenties, he had made a series of breakthroughs that helped launch the string-theory revolution in physics and earned him, in addition to a Fields Medal—the most coveted award in mathematics—a reputation in both disciplines as a thinker of unrivalled technical power.

Yau had since become a professor of mathematics at Harvard and the director of mathematics institutes in Beijing and Hong Kong, dividing his time between the United States and China. His lecture at the Friendship Hotel was part of an international conference on string theory, which he had organized with the support of the Chinese government, in part to promote the country’s recent advances in theoretical physics.

(…)
the Fields Medal, which is awarded every four years, to between two and four mathematicians, is supposed not only to reward past achievements but also to stimulate future research; for this reason, it is given only to mathematicians aged forty and younger. In recent decades, as the number of professional mathematicians has grown, the Fields Medal has become increasingly prestigious. Only forty-four medals have been awarded in nearly seventy years—including three for work closely related to the Poincaré conjecture—and no mathematician has ever refused the prize. Nevertheless, Perelman told Ball that he had no intention of accepting it. “I refuse,” he said simply.

How Perelman summarizes the colloquium where he refused the Field, 1st ever to do it:
“He proposed to me three alternatives: accept and come; accept and don’t come, and we will send you the medal later; third, I don’t accept the prize. From the very beginning, I told him I have chosen the third one.” The Fields Medal held no interest for him, Perelman explained. “It was completely irrelevant for me,” he said. “Everybody understood that if the proof is correct then no other recognition is needed.”

di Gianni Mucè (dalla pag. facebook dell’artista): ARITMETICA GEOMETRICA

Newt Gingrich’s misunderstanding, and good readings

I am reading  The New Yorker  oL, before leaving home, and at p. 19-20 (current, March 8 issue) I read a comment on the recent Conservative conference in the US – by Heindrik Hertzberg.

Actually, Camus and Orwell are among the most restricted set of our reference Authors, together with Proudhon, Levinas et alii. And this a libertarian “post-socialist” X-pedia. But we are happy Newt is now reading our own reference-books, as we have always been reading and learning from Friedman and Hayek!!!